Sunday, March 17, 2019

CAUSAL DETERMINISM OF BIG BANGS?

SEE ALSO: https://www.icr.org/article/big-bang-hubble-contradiction




It occurred to me recently that no one ever talks about what caused the Big Bang to begin with and/or that in endless limitless four dimensional space why would there be one universe and/or one Big Bang and not too many to be counted?

My theory is if a tsunami in one region of the universe on earth can cause a gamma ray burst in another part of the universe light years away (X) then why wouldn't massive implosions of stars etc (for instance) remotely cause massive explosions of equal value elsewhere? And if Einsteins' mathematical equation E = MC2 is applied in a creative way in this instance; then seismic activity can be seen as the equivalent of splitting an atom; and the ensuing gamma ray burst and/or other equal remote reaction can be seen as a nuclear reaction of sorts. That could explain and/or perhaps suggest why there is a seemingly larger reaction and/or effect than the alleged initial action and/or cause in this case. And what happens remotely (for instance) when two entire planets collide? 

Quantum Entanglement theory could offer an explanation:
https://lreresearch.blogspot.com/2017/01/quantum-entanglement.html 

"EINSTEIN'S 'SPOOKY ACTION AT A DISTANCE' SPOTTED IN OBJECTS ALMOST BIG ENOUGH TO SEE? One of the strangest aspects of quantum physics is entanglement: If you observe a particle in one place, another particle—even one light-years away—will instantly change its properties, as if the two are connected by a mysterious communication channel. Scientists have observed this phenomenon in tiny objects such as atoms and electrons. But in two new studies, researchers report seeing entanglement in devices nearly visible to the naked eye.

“There really is an interesting open question, which is: ‘How far can you go up in scale?’” says Andrew Armour, a physicist at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom who wasn’t involved in the work. The advance could also pave the way for ultrasensitive measurements of gravity and a hack-proof quantum internet.

Albert Einstein colorfully dismissed quantum entanglement—the ability of separated objects to share a condition or state—as “spooky action at a distance.” Over the past few decades, however, physicists have demonstrated the reality of spooky action over ever greater distances—even from Earth to a satellite in space. But the entangled particles have typically been tiny, which makes it easier to shield their delicate quantum states from the noisy world..."

GO TO: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/04/einstein-s-spooky-action-distance-spotted-objects-almost-big-enough-see

Note: My theory is if you mix A) Quantum Mechanics which "deals with the mathematical description of the motion and interaction of subatomic particles, incorporating the concepts of quantization of energy, wave-particle duality, the uncertainty principle, and the correspondence principle" -- with B) Quantum Entanglement which is "a quantum mechanical phenomenon in which the quantum states of two or more objects have to be described with reference to each other, even though the individual objects may be spatially separated. This leads to correlations between observable physical properties of the systems" -- you end up with two separate parts of a larger equation that need to be combined to see the big picture...

And to me the sheer existence of empty space waiting for mass to cause space time within it IS a form of universe; as limitless space is always my main focus more than any one particular entity of expanding mass that occurred within it. If you look at it this way the universe always existed along with it's endless potentiality for the creation of mass and/or matter; and there is only one universe to exist within. I see the creation of matter and/or energy within that endless space as perhaps working like a nuclear explosion where something seemingly comes from 'nothing' -- but the cause and/or action that occurred (implosion? etc) to create that particular segment of space time perhaps occurred remotely and/or at a distance. Either way you slice it 'the universe of endless space time potential' as we know it remains one large limitless reality...

<><><>

UPDATE / 31 MARCH 2019: Why would anyone think there was no matter and/or energy in the known universe at one point in 'time' before space time even existed within this dimensional realm or elsewhere? That is a ridiculous notion. As in the justice system; evidence must first be discovered and presented for any allegation to become a reality -- and the same goes for theoretical scientific observation. Maybe our obsession with numbers and mile-long mathematical calculations to find answers is part of this multi-dimensional problem -- perhaps wrongfully assuming there needs to be a zero starting point for everything. But zero can also express the circle of infinity and/or limitless, infinite, innumerable space as expressed in my simple Algebraic equation: x + y = 0.

In other words; the center of the spatial universe is everywhere... 

In light of this; it should seem obvious that the terms macro and micro are entirely relative and based upon our own particular limited human perspectives and/or relative size as humans. Therefore the macroscopic reality of Quantum Entanglement merged with the microscopic reality of Quantum Mechanics can finally be unified and/or consolidated as everything is just a scale model of everything else.

If an elementary particle can be endlessly halved without disappearing ~ then conversely perhaps entire universes can emanate from seemingly invisible elementary particles and/or 'nothing'...

Perhaps explaining the theoretical 'nothingness' the universe came from to begin with. Quantum gravity has a tendency to compact matter and/or energy into black holes (much like a trash compactor and/or an highly compacted 'unzipped' computer file) while supernovas alternately release highly condensed energy and/or matter. And like a star that goes supernova; a big bang event is perhaps just a very large macro level supernova star emanation event. Perhaps there are giant distant stars that are out of our observational realm that go supernova and create entire universes. 

In retrospect; to fully understand and/or truly appreciate all of the mystery; grandeur and illogical nature of our known universe -- I suppose you have to believe in magic...

updated: 14 November 2023

CRYSTAL SPRINGS RESERVIOR -- THE SAN ANDREAS FAULT -- AND THE 1906 SAN FRANCISCO EARTHQUAKE


"The earthquakes hit just days after last year’s near-catastrophe at Oroville Dam, when the spillway cracked amid heavy rains and 188,000 people fled in fear of flooding.

The timing of the two small tremors about 75 miles north of Sacramento was curious, and frightening. Were the quakes part of a seismic hot spot that caused the giant concrete spillway to tear? Was the weight of the water behind the dam triggering the quakes? Could all of Lake Oroville be prone to slipping?

A group of seismologists, summoned from the U.S. Geological Survey’s research facility in Menlo Park, was put on the case. Their findings were published in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America on Monday..."> GO TO: https://www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/What-caused-nearly-20-000-quakes-at-Oroville-Dam-13473254.php

THEORY: It occurred to me that the 1906 SF earthquake could have been at least partially caused by the presence of Crystal Springs Reservoir -- which was constructed 1887-88. It took about 18 years for seismic pressure and/or subterranean water fed by the reservoir to build up and spread right around the time of the expected 100 year quake -- causing the fault to slip roughly 20 feet along a 100 mile section of land from Loma Prieta to Marin County 18 April 1906. And the other side is; the presence of the reservoir has also so lubricated the fault that the 1989 quake was much smaller than 1906; and perhaps/hopefully subsequent earthquakes will be substantially less severe due to the constant lubrication of the tectonic plates in this region.

"Crystal Springs Reservoir is a pair of artificial lakes located in the northern Santa Cruz Mountains of San Mateo County, California situated in the rift valley created by the San Andreas Fault just to the west of the cities of San Mateo and Hillsborough, and I-280. The lakes are part of the San Mateo Creek watershed..."

"The southern lake, Upper Crystal Springs Reservoir, was formed when a tributary, Laguna Creek (or Lake Creek), which joined Laguna Grande at the south end, was submerged by construction of an earthen dam (this was the first Crystal Springs Dam) in 1877. The old earthen dam became a causeway between Upper and Lower Crystal Springs Reservoirs when the latter was formed by Herman Schussler's 150 foot tall concrete Crystal Springs Dam, which dammed up San Mateo Creek to form the lower (northern) reservoir in 1888..."


Question: was the 18 April 1906 SF quake larger and more severe than all other annual 100-year San Andreas quakes along the same stretch of fault? If so my theory may be correct...


============================

SEISMIC/METEOROLOGICAL CONNECTION?

Note: A California hurricane is a tropical cyclone that affects the state of California. Usually, only the remnants of tropical cyclones affect California. Since 1900, only two tropical storms have hit California, one by direct landfall from offshore, another after making landfall in Mexico.

Since 1850, only seven tropical cyclones have brought gale-force winds to the Southwestern United States. They are: The 1858 San Diego hurricane that was reconstructed as just missing landfall in 1858, the 1939 Long Beach tropical storm that made landfall near San Pedro in 1939, the remnants of Tropical Storm Jennifer-Katherine in 1963, the remnants of Hurricane Emily in 1965, the remnants of Hurricane Joanne in 1972, the remnants of Hurricane Kathleen in 1976, and Hurricane Nora in 1997, after it was downgraded to a tropical storm.

August 18–19, 1906: A tropical cyclone moved northward from the Gulf of California, and brought rain to southern California...

SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1906_Atlantic_hurricane_season  + SEE ALSO: http://lreresearch.blogspot.com/2014/02/seismic-meteorological-connection.html